Support Vector Machines
MATH-7360 Data Analysis
Dr. Xiang Ji @ Tulane University
Dec 6, 2021
Linearly discriminant analysis
We first revisit linear methods for classification. Let \(G(x)\) be our predictor that takes values in a discrete set of K classes \(\{1, 2, \dots, K\}\). Here we consider a member of a class of methods that model discriminant functions \(\delta_k(x)\) for each class, and classify \(x\) to the class with the largest value for its discriminant function, \(\hat G(x) = \mathop{\mathrm{arg\,max}}_k \delta_k(x)\).
Suppose \(f_k(x) = \Pr(X=x | G = k)\) is the class-conditional density of \(X\) in class \(G=k\), and let \(\pi_k = \Pr(G = k)\) be the prior probability of class k, with \(\sum_{k=1}^{K} \pi_k = 1\). Bayes theorem gives us
\[ \Pr(G=k|X=x) = \frac{f_k(x)\pi_k}{\sum_{l=1}^K f_l(x)\pi_l} \]
Suppose we model each class density as multivariate Gaussian \[ f_k(x) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{p/2} |\mathbf{\Sigma_k}|^{1/2}} e^{-\frac{1}{2}(x-\mu_k)^T\mathbf{\Sigma}_k^{-1}(x-\mu_k)} \]
Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) arises in the special case when we assume all classes have a common covariance matrix \(\mathbf{\Sigma_k}=\mathbf{\Sigma}\). Therefore, comparing two classes \(k\) and \(l\), we see \[ \begin{aligned} \log \frac{\Pr(G=k|X=x)}{\Pr(G=l|X=x)} &= \log \frac{f_k(x)}{f_l(x)} + \log \frac{\pi_k}{\pi_l} \\ &= \log \frac{\pi_k}{\pi_l} - \frac{1}{2}(\mu_k + \mu_l)^T\mathbf{\Sigma}_k^{-1}(\mu_k - \mu_l) + x^T \mathbf{\Sigma}^{-1}(\mu_k - \mu_l), \end{aligned} \] is an equation linear in \(x\). This linear log-odds function implies that the decision boundary between classes \(k\) and \(l\) is linear in x. This means if we divide \(\mathbb{R}^p\) into regions that are classified as class 1, class 2, etc., these regions will be separated by hyperplanes.
The linear discriminant functions are \[ \delta_k(x) = x^T\mathbf{\Sigma}^{-1}\mu_k - \frac{1}{2}\mu_k^T\mathbf{\Sigma}^{-1}\mu_k + \log \pi_k \]
In practice, we need to estimate parameters of the Gaussian distributions using training data
\(\hat \pi_k = N_k / N\)
\(\hat \mu_k = \sum_{g_i = k} x_i/N_k\)
\(\hat{\mathbf{\Sigma}} = \sum_{k=1}^K \sum_{g_i = k} (x_i - \hat{\mu}_k)(x_i - \hat{\mu}_k)^T /(N-K)\).
For more general case where \(\mathbf{\Sigma}_k\) are not assumed to be equal, use quadratic discriminant functions (QDA), \[ \delta_k(x) = -\frac{1}{2}\log|\mathbf{\Sigma}_k| -\frac{1}{2}(x-\mu_k)^T\mathbf{\Sigma}_k^{-1}(x-\mu_k) + \log \pi_k \]
optimal separating hyperplane
Consider a training dataset of \(N\) pairs \((x_1, y_1)\), \((x_2, y_2)\), …, \((x_N, y_N)\), with \(x_i \in \mathbb{R}^p\) and \(y_i \in \{-1, 1\}\)。 Define a hyperplane by \[ \{x:f(x) = x^T\beta + \beta_0 = 0\}, \] where \(\beta\) is a unit vector: \(||\beta|| = 1\). And the classification rule induced by \(f(x)\) is \[ G(x) = \mathop{\mathrm{sign}}[x^T\beta + \beta_0] \]
For separable classes, we can find a function \(f(x) = x^T\beta + \beta_0\) such that \(y_if(x_i) > 0, \forall i\). And we can find the hyperplane that creates the biggest margin between the training points for class \(1\) and \(-1\) with the optimization problem \[ \max\limits_{\beta, \beta_0, ||\beta|| = 1}M \\ \mbox{subject to } y_i(x_i^T\beta + \beta_0) \ge M, i = 1, \dots, N. \]
And it can be more conveniently rephrased as
\[ \min\limits_{\beta, \beta_0}||\beta|| \\ \mbox{subject to } y_i(x_i^T\beta + \beta_0) \ge 1, i = 1, \dots, N, \] where \(M = 1/||\beta||\). This expression is the usual way of writing the support vector criterion for separated data.
Support vector classifier
Suppose now that classes overlap in feature space. One way to deal with the overlap is to still maximize \(M\), with some modification: \[ y_i(x_i^T\beta + \beta_0) \ge M - \xi_i \\ \mbox{or} \\ y_i(x_i^T\beta + \beta_0) \ge M(1 - \xi_i), \\ \] \(\forall i, \xi_i \ge 0, \sum_{i = 1}^N \xi_i \le \mbox{constant}\).
Although the first choice seems natural, it’s a nonconvex optimization problem
The second choice is convex and is the “standard” support vector classifier
The equivalent form is
\[ \min ||\beta|| \\ \mbox{subject to } \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {y_i(x_i^T \beta + \beta_0) \ge 1 - \xi_i, }\\ {\forall i, \xi_i \ge 0, \sum \xi_i \le \mbox{constant.}} \end{array}} \right. \]
Support vector machines and Kernels
The support vector classifier finds linear boundaries in the input feature space. The support vector machine classifier extends the support vector classifier by feeding it with \[ h(x_i)=\left(h_1(x_i), h_2(x_i), \dots, h_M(x_i)\right), i = 1, \dots, N \] , and produce the (nonlinear) function \[ \hat f(x) = h(x)^T \hat \beta + \beta_0 \]
The dimension \(M\) of \(h(x)\) can be very large, infinite in some cases.
The Lagrange dual function has the form
\[ L_D = \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{N}\alpha_i - \frac{1}{2}\sum \limits_{i = 1}^N \sum \limits_{i' = 1}^N \alpha_i \alpha_{i'}y_i y_{i'} \left\langle {h(x_i), h(x_{i'})} \right\rangle. \]
- The solution function \(f(x)\) can be written
\[ \begin{aligned} f(x) &= h(x)^T \beta + \beta_0\\ &= \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{N} \alpha_i y_i \left\langle h(x), h(x_{i}) \right\rangle + \beta_0. \end{aligned} \] And \(\alpha_i, \beta_0\) can be determined by solving \(y_if(x_i)=1, \forall x_i, 0<\alpha_i<C\).
- Both the dual function and solution only requires the kernel function which is the inner products in the transformed space
\[ K(x, x') = \left\langle h(x), h(x') \right\rangle \]
\(K\) should be a symmetric positive (semi-) definite function.
Three popular choices for \(K\) are
\(d\)th-Degree polynomial: \(K(x, x') = (1 + \left\langle x, x' \right\rangle)^d\)
Radial basis: \(K(x, x') = \exp(-\gamma ||x - x'||^2)\)
Neural network: \(K(x, x') = \tanh(\kappa_1 \left\langle x, x' \right\rangle + \kappa_2)\)